In Part 1, we highlighted some of the truths surrounding COVID-19 and how the mainstream media had been wrong. Nevertheless, they relentlessly tried to silence and discredit those of us who got it right the first time… even though those same “experts” now agree with us! In Part 2, we’re going to look at some of the lies and misinformation promulgated by these “trusted sources” and learn how to determine if your news sources are giving you the truth or simply blowing smoke.
Think back to the early days of 2020, when the Diamond Princess cruise ship was among the biggest headlines of the day. Remember the first information we were told about masks? “Only those who are infected need to wear a mask. It is not recommended that healthy individuals wear masks.”
That narrative quickly changed, with masks becoming suddenly mandatory despite virtually ZERO evidence that they worked. In fact, we’ve established that most masks and face covering DON’T protect against the virus, with some even making the possibility of infection WORSE!
In February of this year, the CDC even recommended wearing TWO MASKS, suggesting that this would make people even more safe. But new and existing research, emails from Fauci, and raw data all confirm what we’ve known all along: masks are ineffective and can have numerous, harmful side effects.
For further proof that these mask mandates were useless, look no further than the new guidance telling us that vaccinated people don’t need to wear them. If there’s one thing about these vaccines that has never been disputed, it’s that vaccinated people can still catch and spread the virus. In fact, the jab only claims to reduce the severity of symptoms in those who do contract the disease.
Remember, the mask mandates were all about protecting people and stopping the spread. You weren’t wearing a mask for your own protection, but everyone around you. There was a huge fear that people who had no symptoms (most of the infected, as it turns out) would continue to spread the virus.
Why, then, are vaccinated people suddenly off the hook? Could it be that our leaders know that masks don’t work? Could it be that these vaccines are just another test of our collective civil obedience? Did Pfizer and Moerna show MASSIVE profits this last quarter?
Yes, yes, and yes.
The Wuhan Lab
The lab-leak theory is an interesting one, because most of this information was available 18 months ago (as we discussed earlier). Still the absolute fervor with which governments and media tried to debunk and silence even the idea of a man-made or genetically altered virus was staggering.
But information from Fauci’s emails – combined with newly released information from U.S. intelligence – tells us that they knew all along that COVID-19 was almost certainly designed, produced, and released from the Wuhan Institute of Virology.
Three researchers from China’s Wuhan Institute of Virology became sick enough in November 2019 that they sought hospital care, displaying symptoms “consistent with COVID-19” according to the state department.
November 2019 is roughly when many epidemiologists and virologists believe SARS-CoV-2, the virus behind the pandemic, first began circulating around the central Chinese city of Wuhan, where Beijing says that the first confirmed case was a man who fell ill on Dec. 8, 2019.
The Wuhan Institute hasn’t shared raw data, safety logs and lab records on its extensive work with coronaviruses in bats, further suggesting a leak and coverup by the Chinese government.
According to a new government study (published in Oxford University Press for the Infectious Diseases Society of America 2021), at least seven people in five U.S. states were infected with the novel coronavirus weeks before the states reported their first cases, pointing to the presence of the virus in the country as early as December 2019.
Participants who reported antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 were likely exposed to the virus at least several weeks before their sample was taken as the antibodies do not appear until about two weeks of infection, the researchers said.
Even Facebook had a change of heart when the new information surfaced. Since February 2020, Facebook has said it would remove posts that suggested that the virus was made-man, while the social media platform has also begun to pull posts that spread “vaccine misinformation” or other information that doesn’t align with the official narrative from the CDC, WHO, and NIH..
Last week, the social network made an “about face” and announced that it will no longer remove posts on its platform that take such a stance about the origins of Covid-19.
“In light of ongoing investigations into the origin of Covid-19 and in consultation with public health experts, we will no longer remove the claim that Covid-19 is man-made from our apps,” a Facebook spokesperson reportedly told CNN Business via a statement on Wednesday.
But was there an apology to the people that were labeled as “crazy conspiracy theorists” and “peddlers of misinformation”? Were the people who saw their profiles wiped out for “violating community standards” reinstated? Did Facebook and the mainstream media take time to reconsider their policies to avoid future censorship of accurate information?
No, no, and no.
Death rates from COVID-19 have been the driving force behind lockdowns, bailouts, mask mandates, and pretty much everything else we’ve seen over the last year and a half. How can people argue with the new rules if it’s for the greater good? Why wouldn’t you wear a mask if it could save lives?
But these numbers have been dramatically overinflated, with errors and misinformation coming to light almost regularly throughout the pandemic. Reliable data and information are essential to making decisions. You can’t plan a dinner party if you don’t know what’s on the menu or how many guests will attend. You can’t order parts to fix your car if you haven’t diagnosed the problem.
And you can’t effectively implement drastic, global, “protective” protocols if you don’t yet understand the extent of the virus.
And yet, that’s exactly what’s been happening. Scarce and unreliable data haven’t stopped entire nations from issuing “stay at home” orders and forcibly closing millions of businesses. A massive amount of the U.S. population is now out of work and quarantined in their homes despite virtually no reliable data to support it.
Professor John Ioannidis (an expert in medicine, epidemiology, population health, biomedical data science, and statistics) may have summed it up best:
The data collected so far on how many people are infected and how the epidemic is evolving are utterly unreliable. Given the limited testing to date, some deaths and probably the vast majority of infections due to SARS-CoV-2 are being missed. We don’t know if we are failing to capture infections by a factor of three or 300… This evidence fiasco creates tremendous uncertainty about the risk of dying from COVID-19. Reported case fatality rates, like the official 3.4% rate from the World Health Organization, cause horror — and are meaningless. Patients who have been tested for SARS-CoV-2 are disproportionately those with severe symptoms and bad outcomes. As most health systems have limited testing capacity, selection bias may even worsen in the near future.”
“The numbers are almost meaningless,” says Steve Goodman, a professor of epidemiology at Stanford University. There’s a huge reservoir of people who have mild cases, and would not likely seek testing, he says. The rate of increase in positive results reflect a mixed-up combination of increased testing rates and spread of the virus.
We will need more complete data, smarter data and more coordinated data to communicate something meaningful about the extent of Covid-19 in the United States, how many people are likely to die, which hospitals are likely to be swamped and whether drastic changes in the way Americans live will start to slow down the spread of the virus.
And not every death attributed to the coronavirus is accurately reported. Many of them are bogus.
For starters, there’s no standard protocol for determining COVID-19 deaths. If a person dies and tests positive for the virus, they’re added to the body count. But that’s scientifically irresponsible at best and criminally negligent at the worst. In Italy, New York, and other part of the world where the outbreak has been most severe, the likelihood that many of these fatalities weren’t caused by the virus is high.
We know that COVID-19 is much worse for the older population. Those aged 0-64 make up about 84% of the U.S. population. But they only account for a little over half of the documented hospitalizations and about 20% of all deaths. Meanwhile, those aged 65-84 make up a little over 14% of the population but account for 36% of hospitalizations and 46% of the deaths. Those 85+ makeup only 2% of our population, yet they account for 9% of hospitalizations and a whopping 34% of deaths!
Now, we’re not saying that every life isn’t precious. Anyone who knows us (or our mission) can see that preserving human life is our primary mission. But when you look at the numbers in context, things just don’t add up.
We know that this disease disproportionately affects the elderly. It also disproportionately affects those with compromised immune systems. But so does almost every disease known to man. Did you know that the median life expectancy in the U.S. is about 78 years? The sad truth is that people die every day… and older people die more often.
If an elderly person comes in with health issues, passes away, and is diagnosed with the virus, they are added to the number of people killed by COVID-19 – EVEN IF THEY HAD OTHER UNDERLYING CONDITIONS!
To put that into perspective, there have been reports of people around the country dying from car accidents, drowning, or premature birth who have been counted among the coronavirus victims. But the testing has been notoriously unreliable, and the causation simply isn’t there. Just last week, it was confirmed that a positive test is no longer required to attribute a fatality to the virus.
Even the CDC admitted that the death count was misleading. Last September, the CDC released data showing that 94% of reported COVID-19 deaths may have been falsely reported. According to recent data from this government agency, only 6% of deaths attributed to COVID-19 can actually be attributed to the virus.
We’ve been told that the drastic measures which have destroyed small business, put millions out of work, and officially revoked religious freedoms are necessary. We’ve been told that this virus has killed over 180 THOUSAND Americans since March. But what if that number was lower? What if 94% of the 180,000 fatalities attributed to the disease had other causes of death?
According to the newly released CDC data, only 10,800 of those 180,000 can truly be attributed solely to the virus. The “pandemic” that has crippled our economy and society has been dramatically over-exaggerated. The CDC and our politicians know it. We said the same thing months ago. Millions out of work. Billions in tax bailouts. Suicides, hunger, and abuse skyrocketing.
And the numbers driving this devastation are 94% wrong.
Let’s repeat that:
Only 6% of COVID-19 deaths can actually be attributed solely to the virus itself.
Our government has lied to us, and that lie has been catastrophic. The rise in the number of unemployed workers due to COVID-19 is substantially greater than the increase due to the Great Recession. Substance abuse has increased. Mental health issues have increased. Suicides have increased.
In Colorado, nearly a quarter of the people reported as coronavirus deaths in state statistics don’t have the virus listed on their death certificates — at least not yet — the state Health Department said back in May 2020, adding more uncertainty to how many people the virus has killed in Colorado.
The number of coronavirus deaths in state figures stood at 1,150 deaths as of May 15th. But officials with the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment revealed during a call with reporters that that number does not represent the number of people who have died due to COVID-19
Instead, the death figure CDPHE has been providing for weeks is more accurately described as the number of people with COVID-19 who have died — for any reason. The number of people who have died and have COVID-19 listed on their death certificate is 24% lower: 878, according to CDPHE’s latest figures.
“We recognize that there certainly has been confusion around this topic,” Dr. Rachel Herlihy, the state epidemiologist, said during the call.
Ya think, Rachael?
This kind of track record really makes you question the competence and honesty of these media outlets and government agencies. Was the drastic, tyrannical response to the virus fueled by frightening mortality data? Was that date severely flawed (if not flat-out misleading)? Do certain agencies and platforms have some explaining/apologizing to do?
Yes, yes, and yes.
This is the biggest issue, because it’s the current battle cry of our government and the pharmaceutical industry. It’s so sensitive, in fact, that we actually have to be careful about WHAT we say and WHERE we say it. Like many leading voices (including licenced, practicing physicians), we’ve been attacked, slandered, and severely censored on virtually every platform, so I’ll try to be succinct with the vaccine information and let you draw your own conclusions.
(You can always read more about this stuff at thetruthaboutvaccines.com.)
The vaccine is still in a trial period. The Pfizer-BioNTech coronavirus vaccine has been given an “estimated study completion date” of Jan. 31, 2023. For the COVID-19 vaccine created by Moderna, studies are expected to end on Oct. 27, 2022. You can scream “safe and effective” until you’re blue in the face, but it doesn’t change the reality: we still have no clue about the long term effects of the jab and clinical trials won’t be done for at least 2 more years.
The mortality rate of COVID-19 was low before the vaccines were introduced. Remember, the CDC says only 6% of deaths attributed to COVID-19 can actually be attributed to the virus. The other 94% were accompanied by other comorbidities, such as late-stage cancer, immune disease, and injuries.
If a person dies and tests positive for the virus, they’re added to the body count. However, that’s scientifically irresponsible at best and criminally negligent at the worst. If an elderly person comes in with health issues, passes away, and is diagnosed with the virus, they are added to the number of people killed by COVID-19 – EVEN IF THEY HAD OTHER SEVERE UNDERLYING CONDITIONS!
To put that into perspective, there have been reports of people around the country dying from car accidents, drowning, or premature birth who have been counted among the coronavirus victims. And while it’s unlikely that only 6% of reported deaths were primarily caused by the virus, it may be true that as few as 20% of reported fatalities were actually caused by COVID-19.
That would make the total death rate of COVID-19 in the United States approximately .03% – precisely the same mortality rate reported by the rest of the world.
The companies who make the vaccines can’t be trusted. In 2009, just 12 years ago, Pfizer had to pay $2.3 billion (not million, but billion) to resolve criminal and civil liability because they promoted dangerous pharmaceutical products.Pfizer executives literally plead guilty (to the Department of Justice) for marketing several different drugs “with the intent to defraud and mislead,” and for bribing doctors to prescribe those quack drugs.
Johnson & Johnson is still battling lawsuits claiming that they were directly responsible for the opioid epidemic, that they knowingly sold baby powder that contained asbestos, and that they misrepresented a dangerous surgical mesh (for which they’ve already paid $8 BILLION in settlements).
Now, we’re supposed to trust that these companies are protecting the public with a new, unapproved, untested, expedited vaccine. NO THANK YOU.
There are thousands of reported side effects – including DEATH. VAERS is the primary government-funded system for reporting adverse vaccine reactions in the U.S. Reports submitted to VAERS require further investigation before a causal relationship can be confirmed.
Every Friday, the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) makes public all vaccine injury reports received as of a specified date, usually about a week prior to the release date. Last week’s data show that between Dec. 14, 2020 and June 4, a total of 329,021 total adverse events were reported to VAERS, including 5,888 deaths — an increase of 723 deaths over the previous week. There were 28,441 serious injury reports, up 3,082 compared with last week.
Among 12- to 17-year-olds, there were 59 reports of heart inflammation and 19 cases of blood clotting disorders.
In the U.S., 299.1 million COVID vaccine doses had been administered as of June 4. This includes 126 million doses of Moderna’s vaccine, 162 million doses of Pfizer and 11 million doses of the Johnson & Johnson (J&J) COVID vaccine.
Of the 5,888 deaths reported as of June 4, 23% occurred within 48 hours of vaccination, 16% occurred within 24 hours and 39% occurred in people who became ill within 48 hours of being vaccinated.
The data for 12- to 17-year-olds show:
5,367 total adverse events, including 165 rated as serious and four reported deaths among 12 to 17-year-olds. The youngest deaths reported include two 15-year-olds (VAERS I.D. 1187918 and 1242573), a 16-year-old (VAERS I.D. 1225942) and one 17-year-old (VAERS I.D. 1199455).
773 reports of anaphylaxis among 12- to17-year-olds with 98% of cases attributed to Pfizer’s vaccine, 1.8% to Moderna and 0.5% (or four cases) to J&J.
59 reports of myocarditis and pericarditis (heart inflammation) with 58 attributed to Pfizer’s COVID vaccine.
16 reports of blood clotting disorders, all attributed to Pfizer.
The total VAERS data, from Dec. 14, 2020 to June 4, 2021, for all age groups show:
20% of deaths were related to cardiac disorders.
51% of those who died were male, 45% were female and the remaining death reports did not include gender of the deceased.
The average age of death was 74.5.
As of June 4, 2,012 pregnant women reported adverse events related to COVID vaccines, including 666 reports of miscarriage or premature birth.
Of the 3,211 cases of Bell’s Palsy reported, 53% were reported after Pfizer vaccinations, 42% following vaccination with the Moderna vaccine and 253 cases, or 8%, of Bell’s Palsy cases were reported in conjunction with J&J.
310 reports of Guillain-Barré Syndrome with 45% of cases attributed to Pfizer, 41% to Moderna and 21% to J&J.
92,929 reports of anaphylaxis with 41% of cases attributed to Pfizer’s vaccine, 50% to Moderna and 9% to J&J.
5,907 reports of blood clotting disorders. Of those, 2,482 reports were attributed to Pfizer, 2,017 reports to Moderna and 1,367 reports to J&J.
During the first 4 months of 2021, the US government VAERS database has more reported deaths after receiving COVID-19 vaccines than deaths after all other vaccines COMBINED over the past two decades.
AND YET… the CDC states on their website: “Other than rare reports of severe allergic reactions, analysis of VAERS reports has not detected any patterns that would indicate a safety problem with COVID-19 vaccines.”
When it comes to the new vaccines, the questions (and answers) are pretty simple. Can a vaccine be proven safe and effective if the clinical trials are still two years from completion? Does the VAERS data support the CDC position that there’s no safety concern? Is there ANY reason why we should trust the companies that make these vaccines?
No, no, and no.
The Dangers of Propagandized Media
Here’s the skinny: The American people – and those of the world – have been lied to. The media and the government have been flat-out wrong on a staggering amount of information, changing their stance several times over.
These “authorities” and “trusted sources” have demanded our unquestioned trust and belief, silencing anyone who presents an opposing point of view. People like us have been banned from social media, attacked in the mainstream media, and “fact-checked” by industry insiders who change their tune more than a haunted radio.
The truth is that the mainstream media, social media, and government sources have failed to acknowledge their mistakes or make amends for the attacks on and censorship of the American people who had it right.
The truth is that the nut job conspiracy theorists and anti-vax super-spreaders of misinformation have been right from the very beginning. CNN, Facebook, and the CDC all said the virus wasn’t man-made and blasted anyone who said otherwise. They said not to wear masks, then to wear them, then to wear two, then only wear them if you aren’t vaccinated. They say the vaccines are safe despite a lack of testing and an abundance of adverse reactions.
They continue to cancel anyone in their way, conveniently forgetting their own self-contradictions. You want trusted, reliable sources? You want to hear from the authorities when it comes to your health? Just look at the track record of your sources.
The truth is absolute. The truth is unchanging. And the truth will set you free.