Globalist white papers published by the UN’s World Health Organization (WHO) in 2014 detail a sneaky approach to bypassing parental consent when it comes to vaccinating children ages 6-17.
The document, titled, “Considerations regarding consent in vaccinating children and adolescents between 6 and 17 years old,” explains how to deal with that population group which “may present for vaccination without an accompanying parent or legal guardian.”
The paper gives a normal description of “consent” before describing “assent” as “the process of children’s and adolescents’ participation in the decision-making on vaccination.”
According to the UN description of assent, “International law provides strong support for children’s rights to participate in decisions about their health and health care, and also in the planning and provision of health services relevant to them and based on their evolving capacity.”
Next, the globalist organization notes that the average age of adulthood throughout the world is 18-years-old, and that “in the age group 6 to 17 years cannot provide consent to vaccination and so consent is ‘normally’ required from their parent or legal guardian.”
However, the paper continues to insinuate allowing adolescents to choose for themselves is catching on.
“In a growing number of countries, the age of consent for medical interventions is set below the age of majority. This allows adolescents to provide consent for specific interventions, such as access to contraceptives or HIV testing. Some countries have fixed the age of consent specifically to allow HPV vaccination at 12 years.”
The next part of the document discusses what to do “when children present for vaccination [are] unaccompanied by their parents,” admitting, “it is challenging to determine whether parents indeed provided consent.”
The most nefarious section of the UN white papers is under part 3 of a page titled, “Common Approaches for Obtaining Consent for Vaccination.”
There, health workers are told that “implied consent” is a situation where “the physical presence of the child or adolescent, with or without an accompanying parent at the vaccination session, is considered to imply consent.”
The globalist group claims sending notices to parents announcing vaccination clinics will be appearing at schools is sufficient enough to imply consent if the child then appears at the vaccination clinic without the parent.
In fact, the paper claims it’s the parent’s responsibility to go out of their way to ensure their child isn’t vaccinated without their knowledge or approval.
“Countries that use implied consent for childhood vaccination, consider the parent bringing the child for vaccination as an expression of informed consent,” the document reads.
Under a section touching on mandatory vaccination laws and informed consent, the document claims, “When mandatory vaccination is established in relevant provisions in law, consent may not be required.”
This section is especially applicable considering the Covid-19 pandemic and related mandatory vaccine laws being established by nations across the globe.
Near the end of the 8-page notice, the WHO flat-out tells health care workers to allow children ages 6-17 to decide whether or not they want to be vaccinated, regardless of parental consent.
“Where parental consent is required, health workers should allow older children and adolescents to provide assent to the vaccination,” it states.
Under the Biden administration, the United States has repeatedly followed the UN’s recommended procedures for Covid-19 and vaccinations.
With the Pfizer Covid vaccine being approved for American kids aged 5-11 on Tuesday, can we expect pop-up vaccine clinics to begin injecting schoolchildren against the will of parents?