Presidential candidate Joe Biden repeatedly promised to end fossil fuels in America. There’ll be “no more drilling, including offshore,” he said. “No ability for the oil industry to drill. No more pipelines.” [bold, links added]
Shortly after reaching the White House, President Biden ended Keystone XL pipeline construction and began working with congressional Democrats, environmentalists, and bureaucrats to impose leasing and drilling moratoriums, slow-walk permits, pressure financial institutions to deny funding to fossil fuel companies and implement “social cost of carbon” rules, “environmental justice” programs, “windfall profit” taxes and other policies to close down fossil fuel projects and bankrupt companies.
His Securities and Exchange Commission says companies must “disclose risks” from alleged “man-made climate change” – from their own production, refining, and manufacturing operations; from suppliers and customers using their products; from government anti-carbon policies.
Supplies predictably dwindled, and prices skyrocketed.
Not just for gasoline and other fossil fuels that still provide 80% of all U.S. energy, but for fertilizers, farm chemicals, pharmaceuticals, paints, plastics, cosmetics, and countless other petroleum-based products – and for goods and services that require offices, factories, and stores that need reliable, affordable energy.
In other words, for nearly everything.
Keystone alone would have brought the United States 700,000 barrels of friendly Canadian oil.
That’s equal to the petroleum Russia was sending America before Mr. Biden finally banned the imports after Vladimir Putin’s butchery in Ukraine reached levels that even far-Left Democrats couldn’t stomach.
He begged Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, and Venezuela to increase their oil production.
He used Russia to broker a new nuclear deal with Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei so that Iran can sell more oil on the global market. He apparently believes those sources don’t emit “dangerous” carbon dioxide.
Above all, Team Biden doubled down on calls for America to switch from gasoline cars to electric vehicles, and from coal and natural gas electricity generation to wind, solar, and expensive backup battery power.
They claim this massive, costly restructuring of America can replace “dirty, planet-threatening” fossil fuels with “clean, renewable, sustainable” wind, solar, and battery energy. It’s a duplicitous con.
Wind turbines and solar panels on this scale would defile millions of acres of crop, scenic, and habitat land. They would kill millions of birds, bats, and other wildlife.
They require massive amounts of raw materials (and thus mining) to create expensive, inefficient, weather-dependent energy devices. They and 1000-pound battery modules are the least clean, renewable, sustainable energy sources imaginable.
“Clean” technologies merely replace CO2 and methane emissions in the USA with massive amounts of real toxic pollution in other countries, out of sight and mind, where climate activists can ignore them.
A Green New Deal would make America almost totally reliant on China, Russia, and other despotic and unstable nations for the metals and minerals needed for GND technologies.
Ditto for the equipment itself, because a fossil-fuel-free America wouldn’t have the reliable energy needed to manufacture wind turbines, solar panels, battery modules, transformers, and thousands of miles of new transmission lines.
America’s entire GND energy and economic future could depend on their tyrannical good graces.
China, Russia, and their surrogates could wield green tech as a strategic weapon, banning exports of materials or technologies to advance political goals.
They could even embed trip-switches or backdoors for hackers in the equipment they sell to us, enabling them to shut down parts or all of our electrical grid and economy. A shutdown could kill millions.
The quantities of metals, minerals, and other raw materials required for this “green energy transition” are almost incomprehensible. We would have to mine planet Earth on unprecedented scales.
The first stage of President Biden’s offshore wind energy program alone would require 110,000 tons of non-renewable copper – plus millions of tons of cobalt, lithium, nickel, aluminum, iron, manganese, rare earth elements, platinum, plastics, concrete, and that suddenly very visible and valuable metal: nickel.
His plan calls for 30,000 megawatts of offshore wind energy by 2030. That’s 2,140 monstrous 850-foot-tall 14-MW turbines.
It sounds like a lot of electricity, but it wouldn’t even meet New York State’s peak summertime electricity needs. And they’d generate zero electricity half the year.
Based on average global copper ore bodies, just those 110,000 tons of copper would require removing 40,000 tons of overburden and processing 25,000 tons of ore.
That’s enough crushed rock to cover a 24-foot-wide highway from Washington, DC, to Tampa, Florida, ten feet deep! Just for the copper.
(Or you could bury the White House, Capitol Hill, all the most climate-focused federal agencies, and all Greenpeace, Sierra Club, and other eco-pressure groups’ DC offices under 100 feet of rock and dust.)
Climate-obsessed legislators, regulators, activists, and judges detest and contest mining anywhere in the United States, even to support the Green New Deal they claim is essential to save America, our planet, and humanity from “climate cataclysms.”
They’ve already made millions of acres off-limits to exploration and mining, affecting numerous world-class prospects.
In just the past couple of years, they prevented three critically needed mines from opening: Alaska’s Pebble Mine (billions of pounds of copper, gold, silver, molybdenum, rhenium, and other metals); Minnesota’s NorthMet mine (billions of pounds of copper, cobalt, platinum, and nickel); the enormous lithium deposits in Nevada.
That means GND mining and processing would take place in Asia, Africa, and Latin America, mostly by or under the auspices of Chinese firms – under environmental, pollution control, workplace safety, and child and slave labor rules, standards, and practices that were repudiated in America 50-100 years ago.
Will the White House, congressional Democrats, EPA, Labor Department, and SEC demand that companies disclose all those fossil-fuel uses, risks, environmental impacts, and human rights abuses?
They loudly promote electric vehicles and a total transformation of the U.S. energy system and economy. But they say nothing about acquiring the raw materials and equipment essential for turning these dreams into reality.
They are mute about the ways their “climate protection” racket would allow China, Russia, and other thuggish regimes to pursue their territorial ambitions – and give them unprecedented control over the Western World’s energy, jobs, economies, living standards, foreign policies, and national security.
They make no attempt to calculate how many wind turbines, solar panels, vehicle and backup battery modules, transformers and transmission lines would be needed in a fossil-fuel-free, all-electricity nation.
How many acres of wildlife habitat would be disrupted or destroyed? How many birds and bats and other animals would be killed? How many new mines would have to be opened? Or how many trillions of tons of ores and overburden would have to be blasted away and processed?
They certainly don’t discuss how much our living standards, personal choices, and basic freedoms would be circumscribed in their “clean energy” America.
They don’t ask because they don’t want to know – and don’t want us to even think about these issues.
Putin’s Ukraine war has opened eyes to NATO, disarmament, and Europe’s feckless reliance on Russian natural gas.
Paul Driessen is a senior policy advisor for the Committee For A Constructive Tomorrow (www.CFACT.org) and author of articles and books on energy, climate change, human rights, and environmental issues.
Trackback from your site.