climatechangedispatch.comEnvironment

How The Left Is Using ‘Consensus Science’ To Shut Down Free Speech

mouth free speech tape

mouth free speech tape

It was about eight to 10 years ago that the Left made a unilateral decision to shut down all opposition and any skepticism about climate change by pronouncing that the debate was over.

The “scientific consensus” had been reached as if sent down on tablets from God, that mankind was causing the rapid warming of the planet. Period. End of argument. [bold, links added]

Doubters will be denounced as science deniers and stripped of their science credentials and muzzled by the speech police.

This idea of a scientific consensus is, of course, the diametrical opposite of what scientific inquiry is all about. It is completely ahistorical.

History’s greatest minds and inventors were people who challenged the conventional wisdom of the day.

It’s an updated version of the Flat Earth Societies in the Middle Ages that would imprison those who dared question the scientific consensus of the time that the Earth was flat. The Spanish Inquisition tortured heretics who questioned papal orthodoxy.

The irony of the modern-day inquisitionists is that they are the very people who were the doomsayers of the 1970s who have been so consistently wrong about the future.

These were the people who peddled the “population bomb,” which fizzled. They were the ones who said the Earth was cooling and that we were headed into another Ice Age.

They were the ones who said we were running out of energy, food, and farmland, and we were headed to a Malthusian nightmarish future.

Wrong. Wrong. Wrong.

You’d think they would be humbled. But they are reiterating their certainty that they are the fountains of wisdom.

And now they are getting dangerous with their heavy-handed tactics to squash dissent.

Consider what has happened in California — and soon coming to blue states near you.

Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom just signed a law that will revoke a physician’s medical license for conveying “misinformation” (defined as deviation from expert “consensus”) about COVID-19 and its treatments.

Remember, by the way, this comes from the same people who said that the scientific consensus was to shut down schools and businesses to stop the spread of COVID-19 and that children as young as 5 had to be vaccinated — yet another set of the catastrophic and wrongheaded decision by “the experts.”

Read rest at Townhall

Go to Source
Follow altnews.org on Telegram

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Protected by Security by CleanTalk