Why The Law Forbids The Medicinal Use of Natural Substances

Why The Law Forbids The Medicinal Use of Natural Substances

Editor comments:

The #Rockefellers (see this link) were/are clever business people who knew/know exactly how to manipulate government regulatory bodies to ensure that regulations and even laws are written to protect their business interests first.

As a consequence we live in a world where patented medicines are, by law, always favoured over natural substances that often do a better job with less side effects, if any.

An uninformed media then simply parrots the official narrative without question. quotes alleged experts without declaring their pecuniary interest in the subject matter and any dissenting voice is carefully cut from the presentation.

A great example that sticks in my mind is a 7pm National News item on Australia’s public broadcaster, the ABC, which featured some white coated person situated in the usual laboratory setting, seriously declaring that a patent-able but completely synthetic COPY of a natural substance found in Turmeric was going to be the next #BigPharma miracle drug.

Of course, the media who is charged with ‘reporting’ news, in this case again helped ‘manufature’ the news with a promise that the miracle drug may be available in 5 years time. How items like this could ever be aired in a prime time national news broadcast is a great mystery to me but does illustrate the inordinate power of the corporate establishment to, again, push their agenda even through supposedly independent public media outlets.

Hence, the consensus reality most people appear to subscribe to, must therefor be a blatantly fake construct driven by the profit motive of the ruling #corporatocracy at an enormous cost to the well being and even sheer survival of  all life on this earth.

— Barefoot  Warrior
Editor Continue reading “Why The Law Forbids The Medicinal Use of Natural Substances”

1+

Bill Gates, are vaccines a “miracle” over disease and a “fantastic investment”…

Bill Gates, Co-Chair the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation shows a vaccine during the press conference. UN Photo / Jean-Marc Ferré

Editor comments:

In the early 1970s when my three sons were born, I purchased many books from overseas to be able to study that increasingly popular #Vaccine phenomena. After all, the pro-vaccination #propaganda was already evident at the baby clinic and I wanted to find out for myself if injecting questionable foreign substances into a new baby’s body had merit.

The conclusion my wife and I came to, at a time when having to take full responsibility for the health and welfare of three new born infants started  to take hold, was that there was no logical or evidence supported argument in favour of vaccination and the decision was soon reached to avoid all vaccinations.

Now, nearly 50 years later, I can report that we have never had any doubts that our decision was the right one. Our sons did NOT get any of the so called ‘vaccine preventable’ infectious childhood diseases and neither did they suffer from any of the conditions that now appear so prevalent and widespread among the vaccinated population. No allergies, no neurological conditions, no degenerative diseases. None whatsoever.

The fear driven vaccine apologists would loudly proclaim that we were just lucky.  Yes, that must have been it: Luck…

Read on and see for yourself how lucky we actually were.

— Barefoot Warrior
editor Continue reading “Bill Gates, are vaccines a “miracle” over disease and a “fantastic investment”…”

1+

Vaccines: Who’s Allergic To Thimerosal (Mercury), Raise Your Hand

Wh is allergic to Thimerosol?

Who’s Allergic To Thimerosal? Please Raise Your Hand By TLB Contributing Writer: Lori Almost a year ago I started working in a chemical plant in shipping.  I see a lot of labels come through my area.  Some of the products are low toxicity and some are very toxic.  Products that are very toxic require special packaging when it comes to shipping.  They have to be inside a plastic bag with an absorbent pad inside the bag.  Padding is placed around the products in the box and stickers are placed  are on the box as to the toxicity of the products in the box.

Products that contain mercury have a Skull and Bones diamond on them.  The label looks very similar to this label.

As I’ve explained in blog entries before, Thimerosal is 50% mercury. It’s been touted by the CDC, FDA and the WHO as a safe ingredient in vaccines. However, is this true? What does the science say?

Let’s take a look at the toxicity of Thimerosal.

The LD 50 means LD50 is an abbreviation for “Lethal Dose 50%.” The LD50 value for a chemical is the amount of chemical that can be expected to cause death in half (50%) of a group of a particular animal species when the chemical enters the body by ingestion or skin absorption. The amount required to cause death is normally related to body weight: therefore, the LD50 is expressed in milligrams of chemicals per kilogram of body weight (mg/kg). A typical LD50 statement includes the substance, the route of entry, and the animal species; as shown below:

Toxicological Data on Ingredients: Thimerosal: ORAL (LD50): Acute: 75 mg/kg [Rat]. 91 mg/kg [Mouse].

II. Hazard Identification: Classification of The Substance Or Mixture According to Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 [EU-GHS/CLP]: 

Acute toxicity, Inhalation (Category 2)
Acute toxicity, Dermal (Category 1) 
Acute toxicity, Oral (Category 2) 
Acute aquatic toxicity (Category 1)
Chronic aquatic toxicity (Category 1)

[…]

0

Not just marijuana: The FDA has always denied the existence of therapeutic benefits associated with ALL plants

FDA: Plants are no medicine

(NaturalNews) Those who support the nationwide legalization of marijuana for therapeutic use, were disappointed by the Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) recent failure to reclassify marijuana’s status from that of a Schedule I drug to another more appropriate classification.Since 23 states have now legalized marijuana for medical use, and since numerous studies have confirmed its value as medicine and have proven that it is safe, it seemed the logical next step to begin relaxing the laws at the federal level.

Is marijuana really more dangerous than meth or PCP?

After all, Schedule I drugs under the Controlled Substances Act are defined as those having “high potential for abuse; no currently accepted medical use; [and] lack of accepted safety for use under medical supervision.”

Aside from marijuana, schedule I drugs include heroin and other drugs that can be considered dangerous. But to anyone with any semblance of an open mind, marijuana should not fall into this category – especially considering that Schedule II substances (which are legally considered less dangerous than Schedule I drugs), include methamphetamine, cocaine and PCP.

Could any sane person argue that marijuana is somehow more dangerous than meth, cocaine or PCP?

The truth is that the FDA does not operate on principles that could be considered sane. In fact, the agency’s long history of outlawing natural plant-based therapeutic substancesclearly indicates that its chief mission is to protect the multi-billion dollar pharmaceutical industry.

For example, the FDA’s handling of one such plant-based medicinal substance – pyridoxamine – reveals the extent to which the agency is willing to stoop to protect the interests of drug manufacturers.

In 2005, the pharmaceutical company Biostratum, Inc., found out that pyridoxamine – the active ingredient of one of its new drugs – was already available as a natural supplement and had been on the market for decades.

Fearing the loss of profits, Biostratum approached the FDA asking the agency to declare supplements containing pyridoxamine as being “adulterated” – a move that would effectively prevent anyone other than Biostratum from selling the substance.

Read more at naturalnews.com

0