Are the Democrats a Political Party or a CIA-Backed Fifth Column?

How do the Democrats benefit from the nationwide Black Lives Matter protests? While the protests are being used to paint

Read more

The purge: The natural progression of “woke” censorship is tyranny

(Natural News) As I have noted in the past, in order to be a conservative one has to stick to

Read more

Fed’s Primary Corporate Credit Facility Is Now Operational

Now that the Fed is buying about a $1 billion in corporate bond ETFs weekly, and as of two weeks

Read more

BLM and the Neoliberal Color Revolution in America

Engdahl then breaks down the connections between Black Lives Matter, socialist organizations, George Soros’ Open Society Foundations, the Ford Foundation

Read more

The High-Tech Profiling of Native Americans Under COVID-19 Could Be Headed Your Way

By now it is no secret that COVID-19 is being used to justify profiteering, power grabs, and the incremental decimation

Read more

The High-Tech Profiling of Native Americans Under COVID-19 Could Be Headed Your Way

By now it is no secret that COVID-19 is being used to justify profiteering, power grabs, and the incremental decimation

Read more

COVID, BLM, Identity Politics and the Global Ruling Elite

BLM is being used & funded by the ruling elite. Most people view the left-right paradigm as political reality not

Read more

Why America Needs War

GR Editor’s Note: This incisive article was written on April 30, 2003 in the immediate wake of the war on

Read more

Is the Coronavirus Scare a Psychological Operation?

First published June 3, 2020 Governments have used psychological warfare throughout history to manipulate public opinion, gain political advantage, and

Read more

Coronavirus – The Aftermath. A Coming Mega-Depression…

First published by GR on April 9, 2020 What will be next? Is a question on many people’s minds. Very

Read more

Ethics Scandal Rocks Democrat John Hickenlooper's Senate Campaign

Former Colorado Gov. John Hickenlooper’s (D) ethics scandal has called into question his candidacy for the U.S. Senate. The Colorado

Read more

List of international or US companies supporting Black Lives Matter looting and pillaging

(Natural News) Medium.com tried to scrub this list by “memory holing” the original post by Ashley Rae Groypenberg. In her

Read more

Profits Count More Than Ever, Not Corporate Virtue-Signaling

There has been much discussion, as the economy begins to reopen, as to what the role of businesses under the “new normal” should be.
A recent article in Fortune magazine predicts the public will be more demanding of corporations to use their resources “for the benefit of society at large.”

An Ernst & Young report similarly notes there will be increased public pressure on companies “to proactively address societal challenges, from income inequality to climate change.”
Much of the corporate world has already shifted towards this “stakeholder capitalism” model. The pandemic has clearly accelerated the shift.
Seizing on this changing perception of the role of corporations, the Trudeau government is using its “Large Employer Emergency Financing Facility” program to browbeat businesses into declaring their support for “environmental sustainability and national climate goals” in order to access a bridge loan from the federal government and survive the lockdown-created recession.

Businesses shouldn’t just be doing business, apparently; it’s also their responsibility to support the federal government’s climate agenda.
The main problem with tasking corporations with addressing climate change — or for that matter income inequality, community development, or any other item on a long list of public issues — is that corporations already have an important responsibility.
Taking on additional ones will detract from the purpose for which they exist.
The real social responsibility of corporations was identified most famously by Milton Friedman 50 years ago in an essay in The New York Times Magazine, with the admirably succinct title: “The Social Responsibility of Business Is to Increase Its Profits.”
Nothing since has altered this fundamental responsibility of business. Corporations are still owned by shareholders. It is still the interests of those shareholders — and they are generally interested in maximizing profits — that corporations should serve.
There are also compelling practical reasons, which have only been strengthened by the current economic crisis, for businesses to be responsible for increasing profits rather than achieving collateral objectives.
With massive declines in employment and income in recent months, a speedy and robust economic recovery is urgently needed. The recovery must and will be led by private-sector hiring and capital investment, which are what enable productive activity.
But without profits, hiring and investment cannot be sustained. With the economy in its worst shape since the 1930s, profits are therefore now more important than ever. Corporations need to focus on their bottom lines.
If they are distracted by collateral activities like reversing climate change, the economic recovery will be weakened and delayed.
It is by pursuing profits that corporations ultimately benefit the wider society. Earning profits allows them to deliver financial returns to investors, productive jobs to workers, and goods and services that enrich consumers’ lives.
The Friedman doctrine on the responsibility of businesses was influenced by Adam Smith.
According to Smith, a person in a capitalist economy who puts his capital to work intending his own gain is “led by an invisible hand to promote an end which was no part of his intention … By pursuing his own interest he frequently promotes that of the society more effectually than when he really intends to promote it.”
By contrast, Smith continued, “I have never known much good done by those who affected to trade for the public good.”
The first part of Smith’s quote highlights the fact that corporations must do good in order to earn profits.
The idea that they should instead focus on “social” goals to achieve good mistakenly assumes that profit-maximizing corporations ordinarily are operated rapaciously, to the detriment of workers and consumers.
The reality is that competition renders any such abuse unsustainable and unprofitable. Businesses must deal fairly with both employees and customers or risk losing them to competing firms.
What of the firms that do affect to trade for the public good? The result of their efforts is often to waste resources.
People who run telecommunications companies, for instance, presumably are experts in telecommunications.
But there is no reason to suppose they have special knowledge about climate change, income inequality, community development, or any of the other issues activists might want them to address.
Holding corporations responsible for solving climate change is like hiring a plumber to complete your tax returns or an accountant to repair your sink. The task assigned does not match the skill or occupation.
Efforts and resources will be wasted — which is the last thing we should want when trying to recover from the worst economic downturn in generations.
Read more at Financial Post

Be Social And Share!

Related

Trackback from your site.

Read more

SHOCKING GLOBAL CONTROL SYSTEM EXPOSED

By Alexandra Bruce These are indeed very interesting times in which we’re living. It seems like many of the threads

Read more

Thank Telstra for the loss of your identity

Altnews editor comments: Just this morning I fell foul of the #Stasi style interrogation I was subjected to by some

Read more

Socialism, Privacy And Charity For The Powerful. Capitalism, Surveillance And Rugged Individualism For The Powerless.

Altnews editor’s comment: Our favourite rogue journalist contributor, Caitlin Johnstone, masterfully describes the status quo of the rule by the plutocracy

Read more